Tabloid TV programme overlooks real issues

5 Jul

Panorama risks becoming The Daily Mail of broadcasting as it tries to whip up interest in its latest programme, the tabloid-headlined Can I Sack Teacher?

While the BBC is getting Middle England tutting with indignation by using juicy morsels from the programme to excite the media into alarmist headlines like "Incompetent teachers ‘allowed to continue teaching’‎", "get rid of bad teachers‎", "cosy conspiracy against our children", "why on earth can’t we fire useless teachers?" and "Pass the rotten parcel", the future of the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme, that has transformed many schools, looks uncertain and major projects are set to face the axe.

As a result, many pupils will continue to endure temporary classrooms and crumbling buildings. At the same time, the Government is pressing ahead with its 'free' schools which will require an injection of new money at a time when the government is cutting spending, and create thousands of surplus places in existing schools, resulting in an even larger drain on stretched budgets.

What is even more alarming, is the presence of asbestos in around 75% of schools in Britain in ceilings, wall linings and pipe lagging. In the last 25 years, at least 178 teachers have died from mesothelioma, a form of cancer linked to asbestos exposure. There are no statistics for pupil fatalities because of the disease's long latency. ATAC's recent audit and Voice's own research reveal that in many schools staff are not aware of the dangers of asbestos; they do not know where it is and are not involved in its management.

Along with other unions and campaigners, Voice has been calling for urgent action to improve standards of asbestos management, and to create an action plan for asbestos in schools including: audits, risk assessments, relevant training and guidance, and for all asbestos to be identified and removed in a phased programme when schools are refurbished under BSF.

Instead of investigating these scandalous, life-threatening issues, Panorama is dragging up Chris Woodhead's infamous exaggeration of "15,000 incompetent teachers" made over ten years ago and recycling comments from the GTC's chief executive misrepresented at the time by the media about "17,000 substandard" teachers.

Keith Bartley was also quoted as saying at the time: "If we want to make more of a difference in more classrooms it’s probably not the incompetent teachers that are the problem. It’s teachers who are struggling with their classrooms day-in day-out part of that is behaviour management in increasingly difficult classrooms" and that substandard teachers should not necessarily be sacked but retrained.

That's the crux of this issue. What do we mean by "incompetence"? If there are 500,000 registered teachers in the UK, not all of them will be 'up to the job', but even Chris Woodhead tells the programme that his notorious estimate represents less than 5% of teachers. The 17,000 quoted were "substandard" not incompetent not the same thing at all.

Poor performance can often be short-term and temporary and driven by circumstances bad pupil behaviour ("behaviour management in increasingly difficult classrooms"), workplace bullying, pressures of the job, meeting excessive bureaucracy and targets, illness, not getting on with a new head teacher .

With help and support, training or even, horror of horrors, changing jobs, these issues can often be dealt with successfully.

The programme and other media are exercised by the statistic that "only 18 UK teachers have been truck off for incompetence in the past 40 years" but perhaps that should be seen as positive not negative. Even using the Woodhead figures, 95% of teachers are not "incompetent". Genuine, ongoing "incompetence" should be investigated and dealt with, but striking someone off from their profession should only be a last resort for the most serious, persistent and irredeemable cases.

The Government wants to abolish the General Teaching Council. What will happen to standards then? Who will strike off the incompetent when it's gone? Perhaps Panorama should investigate that instead of asking celebrities to reminisce about their (not very recent) school days years

Let us know your thoughts

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon

5 Responses to “Tabloid TV programme overlooks real issues”

  1. Richard Fraser 06. Jul, 2010 at 11:50 am #

    On the subject of BSF and school playing fields:

  2. Cassandra 09. Jul, 2010 at 8:42 am #

    Best way for Gove to apologise to those schools whose BSF projects have been scrapped when he originally said they hadn’t, would be to restore the projects as a gesture of good will.

  3. Richard Fraser 16. Jul, 2010 at 10:23 am #

    Updates on asbestos:

  4. Sambodok 20. Apr, 2012 at 9:04 pm #

    I am a mom who is struggling to find my place in the education system to support my kids and their teachers. I often worry that my involvement is seen as telling them what to do or sticking my nose in . Reality is that I see that they too want things to change but sometimes need support, expertise, advocacy and cheerleading to make it happen. This project you have shared really encapsulates what I would like to say to them so that they learn not to fear parent involvement. That we simply want to be part of finding solutions for our SHARED interest. We are all after the same thing, we just need to drop the roles and work as a team.


  1. Anonymous - 05. Jul, 2010

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dorothy Lepkowska. Dorothy Lepkowska said: RT @Voicetheunion: @DotLepkowska Voice's latest blog (Panorama on 'bad' teachers, BSF & asbestos in schools): […]

Leave a Reply