Do you agree with Voice General Secretary Philip Parkin that the English Baccalaureate is "narrow and pointless" or with the Commons Education Committee that it "should not have been introduced before the National Curriculum Review was completed", or with the DfE and Schools Minister Nick Gibb that “these academic subjects reflect the knowledge and skills young people need to progress to further study or to rewarding employment"?
Have your say on the EBac/Ebacc/E-Bac (opinions vary!) in our poll (right) and add your comments below
Poll result: What do you think of the English Baccalaureate (EBac/EBacc)? (29 July 24 August 2011)
- It is useful and should continue in its present form: 13% (2 votes)
- It should be revised to include more subjects that are currently excluded: 40% (6 votes)
- It is pointless and should be abandoned: 47% (7 votes)