Are extended (free) school services for the benefit of children or parents?

25 Jan

Voice General Secretary Philip Parkin took part in a discussion on BBC Radio 4's You & Yours (0:19:21) about The Free School Norwich, which:

"is open for 51 weeks of the year, providing an extended school service specifically designed to enable parents to work. Squirrels [Extended School] is open to all children who attend the school and operates both during term time and throughout the school holidays from 8.15 am until 5.45 pm. It is closed on Bank Holidays and for one week at Christmas only. Squirrels is chargeable, but charges are kept to a minimum for parents."

Also taking part were the school's Principal, Mrs Tania Sidney-Roberts, who was interviewed first, and Anastasia de Waal from the Civitas think tank.

From Voice's point of view, the brief time limit on the discussion meant that the debate was not able to include wider issues, some of which were touched on briefly and others not at all. These included:

  • The principle of extended school hours. While many state-funded schools already provide 'extended schools' facilities, such as childcare and activities, and many have nurseries attached, there should be a time limit on them for the sake of the children. Schools shouldn't take over parental duties for longer and longer periods. Schools are there for the benefit of children, not parents. It is what is best for the children that should be the most important principle.
  • Concerns about funding. It is important that there should not be a direct or indirect subsidy of the private childcare facilities at this or others schools by state/taxpayer-provided education funding intended for the school. The childcare facility should be fully and separately funded, either from parental fees or Extended Schools money. We would not want to see the school fail because of any issues with the business model of the childcare side.
  • Changes to the school term. Voice has for a long time been open-minded about the current school year. We would always give consideration to proposals for varying the current terms and holidays provided that they met children's educational and welfare needs and took into account the well-being of teachers that is crucial in order for them to do their job effectively. We mustn't forget that children are required to work intensively during term and they also need holidays to recover and prepare for term time. However, five or six term models are not new and are operated in a number of local authority areas.

Do let us know your thoughts…

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon

One Response to “Are extended (free) school services for the benefit of children or parents?”

  1. Richard Fraser 24. Jul, 2012 at 10:53 am #

    “Many free schools promise smaller class sizes and longer opening hours. A free school in Norwich, for example, is open six days a week, 51 weeks a year. This is what more state schools should be doing.” (Janet Murray, The Guardian) [www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/jul/23/why-send-child-to-private-school]

    Do you agree?

Leave a Reply